25 January 2006
-- you owe it to yourself. Watch this music video, by Sigur Ros. It’s, simply, a work of crushing beauty...
... I was reminded of this post while in chapel today...
... it is one thing to innumerate the prossiblities, and wholly another, to chose and limit them...
... the noble act is self-sacrificial. A knight is not heroic if he grudgingly sets off to slay a dragon; nor is he noble if he does it for the sake of his own pleasure. He is noble if he sets to the task for the sake of another and he is not primarily motivated by the aesthetic element -- a maiden needs saving, but he slays the dragon for her salvation, not primarily to attain her. He may desire that; he may take pleasure in the battle -- but he if he were placed in position to kill and be killed, he’d do so -- for her sake. The aesthetic element is a consequence of right choice, not the primary cause of action. We seem to have this backwards -- battling the dragon for pleasure, we’re surprised when our bodies are maimed, our spirits crushed and the pleasure flees...
... what we have is an age where love has become untethered: it now binds itself, commits itself, just as love ought -- but to any number of things. Love is no longer regarded as “free” in the sense that it is not to be attached to anyone thing, as in the ‘60’s. But it is free in another sense: it must be attached to some thing, but its attachment might be to anything. So long as it eventually commits to something, it is love -- and, certainly, it must explore the landscape, to see where it belongs. The object isn’t as significant as the the committment. (from an external perspective -- it quite matters to the individual. The object matters to the individual, but the act of committment is regarded as the act of love, from the perspective of others. I can’t judge what or whom you love; I can only judge that you love...)
... look outward. Socrates, you are wrong. I find nothing in my mind, but mire and confusion...
